I dont think its necessary for aditional time to be spent @ the colledge..i definitely think the format should change ...too much time is wasted there.when other things could be taught....
As a. Company we should be allowed to let these trainees & pt1s gain more experiance with us b4 we send them to colledge...because no-one fails the course, there is no fall back on the employers or bad reputaton to be gained through sending guys off that arnt ready. Like alister said we have to have avteainned workforce, and we could continue with the grants etc but this should be opened up to individuals not just companies maybe with the re-introduction ofthe assessed route even...but there has to in my opinion be no time limit to trainee status and a minimum to pt1 & 2....
I'm not gonna state "in the good old days"lol but surely the newbies are better off experiancing work under the guidance of a decent chargehand...the old system we worked to wasn't broke or in need of fixing & produced some of the finest scaffs i ever had the pleasure to work with- many of whom now own their own companies...perhaps, just perhaps we would be better to go back, but with all the money the centres now make i just cant see it happen
And another good post,back in the day only the best got put through their tickets and then only when they were ready,now everyone gets put through regardless of suitability to do the job and it's all about money nowadays,do other trades have to pay through the nose to go to work?we had a very good,albeit loosely based system,that worked:worried: