ianrip
Member
Howdy
my NEW company who I've just joined, wants to ban ANY type of system scaffold in the next scaffold service contract, we currently have a contractor using T&F which is great, but for me it’s always better to have an alternative ( I like CUPLOCK)
I think they are concerned about the integrity on the welds of the CUP’S and the chance of any spark during erection/dismantling.
I’m based in a HUGE oil & gas facility in the middle east, so the other clients use system all the time, I’m trying to justify using ANY system as a secondary type, T&Fis always great for the main maintenance works we have on a day to day basis, but for the up and coming painting campaign I’m pushing them to include SYSTEM scaffold.
Any help with the justification, such as
• Costs can be reduced as system will use materials
• Time saved, = less time exposed to working at height
• Lighter loads on any scaffold over 30 mtrs height etc
• Any :weird: ????
my NEW company who I've just joined, wants to ban ANY type of system scaffold in the next scaffold service contract, we currently have a contractor using T&F which is great, but for me it’s always better to have an alternative ( I like CUPLOCK)
I think they are concerned about the integrity on the welds of the CUP’S and the chance of any spark during erection/dismantling.
I’m based in a HUGE oil & gas facility in the middle east, so the other clients use system all the time, I’m trying to justify using ANY system as a secondary type, T&Fis always great for the main maintenance works we have on a day to day basis, but for the up and coming painting campaign I’m pushing them to include SYSTEM scaffold.
Any help with the justification, such as
• Costs can be reduced as system will use materials
• Time saved, = less time exposed to working at height
• Lighter loads on any scaffold over 30 mtrs height etc
• Any :weird: ????
