Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 99

Thread: has the minimum height changed

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    441
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 314 Times in 186 Posts

    Default

    The Working at Height Regulations is what the law courts will base there finding on, 950mm from the underside of the handrail 50mm thickness of the tube =1meter. 225mm toe board + 470mm gap + 50mm tube thickness +470mm gap + 50mm tube thickness =1265mm.
    Share the Love/spread the load

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    43
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 26 Times in 15 Posts

    Default

    The little **** is talking rubbish !!!!!!!!!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Wombwell
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 36 Times in 24 Posts

    Default

    thats cool,but i thought a tube was 48mm,lol
    there is another 1 with 4xthickness thats 10mm out 2,any1 know it?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to grum For This Useful Post:

    Gaz (3rd October 2011)

  5. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    441
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 314 Times in 186 Posts

    Default

    48.3mm if you want to start spliting hairs.But for you we will call it 50mm.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to instructor For This Useful Post:

    grum (7th October 2010)

  7. #25
    ragscaff's Avatar
    ragscaff Guest

    Default

    But for you we call it 50mm.

    Can you spread the ties to 8m again?

    Ladder height?

    Base lift Height?

    Number of transoms in a loading bay?

    If so I might get home early & see what the wife looks like!!


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to ragscaff For This Useful Post:

    Gaz (3rd October 2011)

  9. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    441
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 314 Times in 186 Posts

    Default

    Ties 4m or 16 m2.
    Ladders 1050mm.
    Base lift Heigth 2.7m
    Loading bay transoms undesigned 900mm.
    The wife bit i cannot help you with.

  10. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    9,428
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 5,403 Times in 3,080 Posts

    Default

    and heres me thinking a tube was 2 inchs thick

  11. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Greenmount, Bury
    Posts
    711
    Thanks
    413
    Thanked 198 Times in 150 Posts

    Default

    depends on how much mud is left on the outside from all the bombing!!!! ha ha!

  12. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    9,428
    Thanks
    2,815
    Thanked 5,403 Times in 3,080 Posts

    Default

    arrrr tube turds

  13. #30
    ragscaff's Avatar
    ragscaff Guest

    Default

    Loading bay undesigned !!!

    Back to the old days

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

New To Site? Need Help?