Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Jewson fined for selling 63,000 dodgy hard hats

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    A4109
    Posts
    8,336
    Thanks
    5,717
    Thanked 3,775 Times in 2,328 Posts

    Default Jewson fined for selling 63,000 dodgy hard hats

    Jewson Limited has been fined £14,000 for supplying hard hats that failed to meet the relevant safety standards.

    Trading standards officers from Northamptonshire County Council arranged for safety helmets to be tested against the requirements of the Personal Protective Equipment Regulations 2002 in January 2012.

    Northampton Magistrates Court heard the tests included a Jewson Safety Helmet purchased from the company’s store in Corby.

    When tested the helmet did not comply with the shock absorption test in EN 397.

    A further six helmets were purchased from another Jewson branch in Northampton and three of these also failed the same test.

    The helmets stated “complies with : EN397” and had been imported from China by the company.

    Jewson were only able to produce a test certificate from 2001 despite selling over 63,000 of them over an 11 year period.

    Councillor Andre Gonzalez de Savage, county council cabinet member for strategic infrastructure, economic growth and public protection said: “I’m pleased that Trading Standards have investigated and prosecuted this case.

    “It is impossible for users to detect this kind of issue for themselves and therefore it is vital that our officers proactively monitor the safety of products on sale.

    “All manufacturers and importers need to carry out regular testing to ensure their products meet safety standards.

    Magistrates fined the Coventry-based business £2,500 on each of four offences and £4,000 for the latter offence. Costs of £7,500 were awarded to trading standards.

    A spokesperson for Jewson said: “As soon as we became aware of the issue, the product was immediately removed from all Jewson branches.

    “Jewson takes matters of compliance and quality very seriously and immediately conducted its own investigation and report into the sale of the product.

    “While it concluded that the safety of the user was not compromised, it did confirm that the product did not conform to EN397 or Jewson’s high standards.

    “Jewson deeply regrets this breach and has already taken measures to ensure that such failings cannot reoccur.”
    .

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to SWIFTY For This Useful Post:

    stonedrose1 (31st October 2013)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,131
    Thanks
    1,395
    Thanked 1,488 Times in 876 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SWIFTY View Post
    Jewson Limited has been fined £14,000 for supplying hard hats that failed to meet the relevant safety standards.

    Trading standards officers from Northamptonshire County Council arranged for safety helmets to be tested against the requirements of the Personal Protective Equipment Regulations 2002 in January 2012.

    Northampton Magistrates Court heard the tests included a Jewson Safety Helmet purchased from the company’s store in Corby.

    When tested the helmet did not comply with the shock absorption test in EN 397.

    A further six helmets were purchased from another Jewson branch in Northampton and three of these also failed the same test.

    The helmets stated “complies with : EN397” and had been imported from China by the company.

    Jewson were only able to produce a test certificate from 2001 despite selling over 63,000 of them over an 11 year period.

    Councillor Andre Gonzalez de Savage, county council cabinet member for strategic infrastructure, economic growth and public protection said: “I’m pleased that Trading Standards have investigated and prosecuted this case.

    “It is impossible for users to detect this kind of issue for themselves and therefore it is vital that our officers proactively monitor the safety of products on sale.

    “All manufacturers and importers need to carry out regular testing to ensure their products meet safety standards.

    Magistrates fined the Coventry-based business £2,500 on each of four offences and £4,000 for the latter offence. Costs of £7,500 were awarded to trading standards.

    A spokesperson for Jewson said: “As soon as we became aware of the issue, the product was immediately removed from all Jewson branches.

    “Jewson takes matters of compliance and quality very seriously and immediately conducted its own investigation and report into the sale of the product.

    “While it concluded that the safety of the user was not compromised, it did confirm that the product did not conform to EN397 or Jewson’s high standards.

    “Jewson deeply regrets this breach and has already taken measures to ensure that such failings cannot reoccur.”
    What about the guy with a half brick imbedded in his nut eh? What about him Jewson? Aaaaaaarrrrrggghhh !!!!!!

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to stonedrose1 For This Useful Post:

    scaffy 1980 (31st October 2013), SWIFTY (1st November 2013)

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Yorkshire
    Posts
    2,282
    Thanks
    1,362
    Thanked 1,325 Times in 802 Posts

    Default

    14000 finefor 63,000 helmets not a bad return how much was 1 helmet in the first place approx 10spot
    Last edited by Stella Fella; 31st October 2013 at 11:11 PM.


    Don't take life Seriously -Its not Permanent.

    Leones ducti asinis.

    YOLO

  6. #4
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    worcestershire
    Posts
    8,078
    Thanks
    3,670
    Thanked 2,514 Times in 1,919 Posts

    Default

    Works out at 0.22 pence fine per hat.
    Den armstrong.

    If you dont value your time, neither will others. Stop giving away your time and talents. Value what you know and charge for it...

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,131
    Thanks
    1,395
    Thanked 1,488 Times in 876 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scaffy 1980 View Post
    Works out at 0.22 pence fine per hat.
    0.20p more than they were worth by all accounts.

  8. #6
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    worcestershire
    Posts
    8,078
    Thanks
    3,670
    Thanked 2,514 Times in 1,919 Posts

    Default

    Im fortunate enough to never have had to buy one, just nicked them....lol
    Na, its makes you think what else have they sold that deosn't conform to the regs.mmmm. boots, gloves hi vizzys maybe even dodgy eye protection. Im not saying they have but you just dont know.
    Den armstrong.

    If you dont value your time, neither will others. Stop giving away your time and talents. Value what you know and charge for it...

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

New To Site? Need Help?