Search:

How is the old SCCR going?

I think it can be proven - so long as a structural transom is installed either side of the splay; usually within 0.3m from the node.

Wrong thread!

I doubt they’d fit in a letter box, mate.

You get confused, don’t you.

You’re about 4 weeks behind the rest of the industry, mate.

So you decided to fix a load-bearing component with a non load-bearing coupler?

👍🏻

A scaffold with 3-inside boards requires design under TG20:13, so the question is essentially pointless.

I would except a bridal tube to be fixed with load-bearing fittings, nevertheless....

Has this ‘hit the headlines’ yet? 😐

You need to get out more.

Nobody cares

Thank you for your appraisal.

I think it's a fair assessment.

I'm deaf in one eye.

Absolute nonsense. Anyone working within the scaffolding industry & promoting these accusations should be ashamed of themselves. I read in the Metro that it was some fat idiot and his blokes, who...

Can we PLEASE have an update on the MAYHEM & PANIC that these revelations from Victor Meldrew have caused.

If I wanted sarcasm I would speak to my children.

Work it out for yourself, you melt.

Just for the record, Mr Angry, you are not causing either 'mayhem' or 'panic' anywhere, in any world that I live in.

You are just another bitter-sounding also-ran, who understands nothing about...

People like the OP.

Stating “A recent Scaffolding Industry Magazine has picked up on this and so far it has gone under the radar” is a fairly bold statement, considering it’s been on the CISRS...

More incorrect nonsense.

More inane nonsense.

No, not all.

That would be an engineer then; not a few clueless idiots second-guessing!

Another pointless thread.

Jesus wept.

CITB instructors are just failed scaffolders. The ones at Erith have always been clueless.