Fenland demolition man fined £6,000 for putting son's safety at risk during work on L

SF Admin

Administrator
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
7,160
Reaction score
4
A DEMOLITION contractor from the Fens was fined £6,000 for allowing his son to work on a pub roof without scaffolding.

The Health and Safety Executive prosecuted Ivan Pope after two men were spotted dismantling the roof of a disused pub in Lincolnshire using just the upturned bucket of an excavator to work from.

Leicester Crown Court heard that between January 16 and 25 2008, Mr Pope, trading as Westwise Demolition, was demolishing the former Manvers Arms public house on Monks Road in Lincoln. The demolition involved piece-by-piece removal of the two storey pub's roof tiles.

One man sat on the roof, removing tiles and passing them to the son of the defendant, who was standing in the upturned bucket of an excavator positioned level with the edge of the roof.

Once the bucket filled with tiles, Mr Pope's son climbed onto the roof before the bucket was lowered, emptied and raised back up; he then climbed back in and carried on the task.

There was no scaffolding to prevent the men on the roof from falling and nothing to protect those working below from any tiles dropped or dislodged during these activities.

Mr Pope, of Hassock Hill Drove, Gorefield, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire pleaded guilty to two counts of breaching Section 3 (2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 for failing to ensure people not in his employment were not exposed to risks to their safety.

He was fined £6,000 and ordered to pay £13,483 costs by Leicester Crown Court.

The Health and Safety Executive have reminded employers of their responsibility to protect their workers following the case.

After yesterday's hearing, HSE Inspector Martin Giles said: "This was foolhardy to say the least and could so easily have resulted in serious injury or even death. It is particularly disturbing that Mr Pope was willing to risk the life of his own son by failing to put such basic safety requirements in place.

"Working at height remains one of the greatest dangers to construction workers. Many incidents can be avoided if contractors identify a safe way of tackling a job, provide all necessary protective equipment and ensure that workers, sub-contractors or casual employees are fully trained and properly supervised.

"Demolition must be properly planned and, in this case, providing adequate scaffolding or a proper mobile elevating work platform would have allowed this work to be done safely.

Source: Cambs Times
 
saftey is non existant when theres money to be made the presssures of your company and wanting to keep your job it is not worth a life or injury
thats why i think hse should be employeed on to a company to be on site all times to stop things like this happening

otherwise

what do you do we are stuck
 
What has happened in that situation is shocking to say the least and it seems only good luck stopped a potential fatality.

Further to that I would love to see just for once "The Client" up in the dock as well, they have obviously taken the cheapest price (As per f*cking usual) with not one investigation as to how his Sub - Contractors were going to undertake the work!! And that is without going into the ins and outs of their responsibilities under a huge raft of H&S legislation.

No doubt they have had prices from other Demo Contractors who have included for the provision of a safe working platform to undertake the removal of the tiles but of course their price is going to be way out.

If just one Client got prosecuted it would make them think twice about always excepting the cheap option.

As the old saying goes: If something looks too good to be true...It usually is!!
 
Top Bottom