Scaffolding Software A forum for the discussion of Scaffolding Software including Scaffolding Design, Estimating and Drawing Software.
Scaffolding Software Forum Proudly Sponsored By:



16th July 2016




Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 17
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Cantilever formula
Hello, gents!
i am new here, and i am looking for a formula to solve a calculation for a cantilever.
Please see attached!
A solution would be much appreciated!
Would be possible to solve this in Robot from Autodesk?
Last edited by pride2iceman; 16th July 2016 at 01:19 PM.

16th July 2016




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 9,311
Thanks: 2,736
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,037 Posts


W X P / T X 3
W = weight
P = projection
T= Tailing length
__________________
#scafflivesmatter

The Following User Says Thank You to philliosmaximus For This Useful Post:


18th July 2016




Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Turkey
Posts: 26
Thanks: 17
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by philliosmaximus
W X P / T X 3
W = weight
P = projection
T= Tailing length

Can you explain more ? I didnt get where the 3 comes from?

18th July 2016




Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Thanks: 112
Thanked 200 Times in 147 Posts


Safety factor. Some people use a factor of 4.

18th July 2016




Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Turkey
Posts: 26
Thanks: 17
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by lmk
Safety factor. Some people use a factor of 4.

Thanks for the answer

18th July 2016




Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Thanks: 112
Thanked 200 Times in 147 Posts


Your welcome.

19th July 2016




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 411
Thanked 1,013 Times in 542 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by pride2iceman
Hello, gents!
i am new here, and i am looking for a formula to solve a calculation for a cantilever.
Please see attached!
A solution would be much appreciated!
Would be possible to solve this in Robot from Autodesk?

Some considerable time ago I created a simple spread sheet for cantilevers PM me a mail ID if you think it would be of use
Alan

The Following User Says Thank You to Alan Reade For This Useful Post:


19th July 2016




Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 76 Times in 49 Posts


Just to interfere here. Be careful with the 3 times and 4 times safety factors chaps.
Work out what the force f is under the applied loading including the self weight of the beam and then decide how you are resisting it. If you were using kentledge, every 1 kg that you add to the kentledge increases the load on the edge of the slab by 1 kg. If you need 1500 kg as in this case to balance the cantilever and that is what you put on it, the load on the edge of the slab is 25 kN (plus self weight). If you multiply the 1500 kg by 4 and put 6000 kg, the load on the slab edge increases to 70 kN which it might not be able to carry.
If you punch off the slab above you are limited by the weight of the slab above to how much force you can apply but assuming there is sufficient weight the load on the slab edge from the beam will only be enough to balance things ie 25 kN.
If you anchor down to the bottom slab, the same thing applies. Here, though, you have a fixing that you may want to over specify to give you confidence that it won't pull out. 15 kN might require 2 no 7.5 kN fixings but you could put a greater number in to give a better safety factor than normal to allow for bad workmanship. On suspended loads a factor of safety of 3 is considered normal (see EN13155) so may be right here but this is the factor between the failure load and, in this case, the working load of 15 kN. A fixing rated at 7.5 kN safe working load already has a factor of safety on its failure load and may not fail until a load of 23 kN is applied to it giving you a factor of safety of 3.
Using serviceability analysis, I would work out the actual load without factoring and then use engineering judgement to decide the type & capacity of the means of resisting it, taking account of the whole situation.
Using ultimate analysis, I would vary load and material factors to suit the situation.
If I was working on site and I saw some anchors that I hadn't put in stopping me toppling off the building with the cantilever, I would probably put a couple of props off the structure above to be sure, to be sure!

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TG6 For This Useful Post:


20th July 2016




Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 17
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Thank you, gents!

20th July 2016




Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
Thanks: 112
Thanked 200 Times in 147 Posts


[QUOTE=TG6;366400]Just to interfere here. Be careful with the 3 times and 4 times safety factors chaps.
Work out what the force f is under the applied loading including the self weight of the beam and then decide how you are resisting it. If you were using kentledge, every 1 kg that you add to the kentledge increases the load on the edge of the slab by 1 kg. If you need 1500 kg as in this case to balance the cantilever and that is what you put on it, the load on the edge of the slab is 25 kN (plus self weight). If you multiply the 1500 kg by 4 and put 6000 kg, the load on the slab edge increases to 70 kN which it might not be able to carry.
If you punch off the slab above you are limited by the weight of the slab above to how much force you can apply but assuming there is sufficient weight the load on the slab edge from the beam will only be enough to balance things ie 25 kN.
If you anchor down to the bottom slab, the same thing applies. Here, though, you have a fixing that you may want to over specify to give you confidence that it won't pull out. 15 kN might require 2 no 7.5 kN fixings but you could put a greater number in to give a better safety factor than normal to allow for bad workmanship. On suspended loads a factor of safety of 3 is considered normal (see EN13155) so may be right here but this is the factor between the failure load and, in this case, the working load of 15 kN. A fixing rated at 7.5 kN safe working load already has a factor of safety on its failure load and may not fail until a load of 23 kN is applied to it giving you a factor of safety of 3.
Using serviceability analysis, I would work out the actual load without factoring and then use engineering judgement to decide the type & capacity of the means of resisting it, taking account of the whole situation.
Using ultimate analysis, I would vary load and material factors to suit the situation.
If I was working on site and I saw some anchors that I hadn't put in stopping me toppling off the building with the cantilever, I would probably put a couple of props off the structure above to be sure, to be sure![/QUOTE
I was talking about pure kentledge as opposed to using anchors. I assume the safety factor of 3 is still relevant there?



Posting Rules

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:56 PM.


