Scaffolders Forum | Scaffold Tools | Scaffolding Jobs and Courses  

Go Back   Scaffolders Forum | Scaffold Tools | Scaffolding Jobs and Courses > Scaffolding News and Information > Scaffolding News


Scaffolding News A selection of news from in and around the scaffolding industry.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 7th December 2009
SF Admin's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 839
Thanks: 123
Thanked 51 Times in 45 Posts
SF Admin is on a distinguished road
Default Unsafe Scaffolding Leads to Prosecution and Fine

An eagle-eyed safety inspector was lied to after he stopped to investigate unsafe scaffolding he was driving past, a court heard.

Health and Safety Executive (HSE) inspector Steve Woods was driving past the Coach & Horses Inn in Billinghay, Lincolnshire, on 11 June 2008 when he saw three employees of Bracknell Roofing Co Ltd using an unsafe tower scaffold to repair a flat roof.

The roof and tower scaffold had no edge protection, inadequate boarding which was not properly attached and it was propped up on bricks and blocks. A manager had visited the site and allowed work to continue only 45 minutes before Mr Woods arrived and found dangerous safety defects.

Bracknell Roofing Co Ltd, of Suffolk Way, Sevenoaks, Kent, was fined £8,000 and ordered to pay full costs of £2572.80 by Skegness Magistrates on 25th November 2009 after pleading guilty to breaching Regulations 4(1) and 8b(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005.

Steve Woods said: This inadequate tower scaffold was owned by Bracknell Roofing and had been taken out of their depot just for this job. The three men on site refused to give me the name of the company and also gave false names and contact details.

Falls from height remain the most common kind of workplace fatality. The men were at risk of serious injury either from falling off the roof or the tower scaffold. The case shows the need for companies to ensure that work at height is properly planned and supervised and that equipment provided is suitable and maintained in good condition.

In this case the equipment that should have been used was easily available and could have been provided by the company if adequate planning of the work had been undertaken. The unsafe working practice should have been stopped by the company manager when he visited site.

Source: Safety Media Ltd
__________________
Scaffolders Forum - The Ultimate Online Community For Scaffolders.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
fine, leads, prosecution, scaffolding, unsafe

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Forum Sponsors
BuyBrandTools.Com - Quality Scaffolding Tools
Downtown For Jobs - Find Your Dream Scaffolding Job
Advertise On The Scaffolders Forum
Advertise On The Scaffolders Forum
Advertise On The Scaffolders Forum
Advertise On The Scaffolders Forum

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright - Scaffolders Forum